This article comes from “naturalnews.com”
- Neurological injuries from vaccines span over two centuries, including paralysis, seizures and encephalopathy.
- Controversial vaccine schedule reforms raise hope for transparency amid decades of censored research.
- NVICP filters most claims, paying only select victims while shielding manufacturers from liability.
- Rebranding of conditions like “mental retardation” to autism obscures true injury rates and public understanding.
- Emerging links between vaccines and chronic illnesses, including autoimmune disorders and developmental disabilities, demand urgent reexamination.
For over 200 years, vaccines—from smallpox to modern formulations—have caused severe, documented neurological damage, often obscured by claims of public health necessity. A recent surge in scrutiny, driven by reforms in vaccine policy and resurfaced historical data, exposes a legacy of minimized risks and unaddressed suffering. As new debates over vaccine safety intensify, the question arises: How many hidden neurological injuries have been buried beneath the “safe and effective” rhetoric?
A legacy of concealed harm
Medical literature brims with accounts of vaccine-linked neurological disasters since the 1800s. Early smallpox vaccines, praised for curbing outbreaks, also triggered encephalomyelitis and paralysis in infants, with fatality rates as high as 35% in some cases. By the mid-20th century, pertussis (DPT) shots drew scrutiny after studies in the Journal of the American Medical Association and Pediatrics reported convulsions, mental retardation and death in healthy children.
In 1933, an infant died within minutes of a pertussis shot, while 1950s reports in The Lancet detailed 100+ cases of infantile myoclonic seizures. A 1977 Scottish study found that 160 DPT recipients suffered severe reactions, including mental defects—yet the CDC excluded such data from contemporary safety claims.
These findings were overshadowed by a “greater good” doctrine, as acknowledged by bacteriologist Sir Graham Wilson in 1966: Vaccines’ risks were buried to preserve trust, even when disasters recurred.
Modern eruptions of an old crisis
Today, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) compensates a fraction of injuries. In the first quarter of 2020, $57 million was disbursed, but critics argue this pales compared to unreported cases. Among verified claims, encephalopathy—often relabeled as autism—dominates after vaccines like MMR.
A pivotal 1993 British Medical Journal study found pertussis-vaccinated children were far more likely to experience “educational, behavioral, neurological, or physical dysfunction” decades post-vaccination. Meanwhile, conflicts of interest plague the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP); its recent shakeup, led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., marks a rare opportunity for transparency.
The VICP’s stringent requirements—limiting accepted injuries to rare “table injuries” like GBS—yield absurdities. As one legal analysis notes: Earlier “mental retardation” diagnoses were reclassified as autism, warping trends while excluding severe cases from redress.
The invisible casualties
Vaccine-injured families face systemic barriers. NVICP rulings favor manufacturers, who are shielded from liability under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Compensation is notoriously slow; many cases languish for years, and countless victims never file claims due to lack of awareness or proof.
The psychological toll is incalculable. A mid-1980s NBC documentary, “DPT: Vaccine Roulette,” profiles children reduced to comas or irreversible disability after pertussis shots—yet mainstream media silence persists. Meanwhile, emerging pathogens like SARS-CoV-2 and their vaccines reignite fears: Pfizer’s pre-rollout documents listed 1,200 potential side effects.
Toward truth or further shadows?
The rebirth of ACIP under RFK’s leadership offers a fragile hope for reckoning with vaccines’ dark history. Yet, the cycle of obfuscation endures. From smallpox’s encephalitis to pertussis’s “post-encephalitic syndrome” and today’s autism debates, the pattern remains: injury, denial and delayed justice.
As public trust wavers, the call grows louder for unbiased research, transparent databases and policies that honor individual health over corporate and institutional imperatives. Without it, the neurological toll—a legacy of silence—will outlive us all.
Sources for this article include: