Candace Owens Drops Rooftop Video Banned By Utah Court, Torpedoes Official Charlie Kirk Assassination Narrative: ‘Not Tyler Robinson’

Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk /

From “thepeoplesvoice.tv”

Candace Owens on Tuesday released devastating unseen footage of the rooftop man seen sprinting atop a building at the Losee Student Center at Utah Valley University as Charlie Kirk was publicly executed.

The new video blows a hole in the official narrative that Tyler Robinson was Kirk’s assassin.

Alex Jones shared a clip of Owens’ podcast, writing, “The Official Charlie Kirk assassination story is now 100% dead! Candace Owens just dropped powerful never before seen surveillance video of the Losee Center rooftop. The video Owens released appears to be raw and unedited! This is the same footage that the court will not let the public see, that we are meant to believe is Tyler Robinson assassinating Charlie Kirk.”

Jones added, “The individual does not look like Tyler Robinson. The rifle is never pulled from his pants. The person in the footage has no limp. Nowhere do we see the shooter assembling the gun on the roof as we were told. No recoil is seen. He performs military maneuvers with precision as well as signaling before opening fire. The official narrative just COLLAPSED…”

Ian Carroll pointed out that before the footage was released the public was told there was crystal clear video proving Robinson was the person who fired the deadly shot.

Carroll also asked why the video doesn’t show the rooftop culprit assembling and disassembling the Mauser .30-06 rifle allegedly used in the murder.

Lawyer and podcast host Viva Frei wrote, “If you can’t identify Tyler from this video (which has been the argument from the beginning, and which I recognize you can’t), you can’t exclude him either. I agree – this video is too blurry, and people will rightly be very skeptical of how Posobiec and Johnson described what they saw in the courtroom. I appreciate this will be an argument for reasonable doubt at trial.”

Lawyer and podcast host Viva Frei wrote, “If you can’t identify Tyler from this video (which has been the argument from the beginning, and which I recognize you can’t), you can’t exclude him either. I agree – this video is too blurry, and people will rightly be very skeptical of how Posobiec and Johnson described what they saw in the courtroom. I appreciate this will be an argument for reasonable doubt at trial.”

Jones responded, noting, “Well, all the witnesses that saw the video in court said they could clearly see his face,” and asking, “My point is when did he put on a black uniform and then when did he take it off?”

Replying to Jones, Viva Frei wrote, “I agree. Two things can be true at once, but people in the court embellishing / misdescribing what they saw doesn’t change the evidence presented at the Preliminary Hearings, nor “holes” that Defense will likely present at trial if it gets there. But this video does nothing to debunk the theory as presented at the Preliminary Hearing, nor does it support some of the other theories. It actually undermines the exploding mic theory. Ok, so people will say this is not Tyler. But by their own revised theory, there is a “military trained” guy on the roof from which the shot allegedly came.”