This article comes from “infowars.com”
A report published Thursday by the House Judiciary Committee documented how the Biden-Harris Administration uses the nation’s immigration courts to push an open-border agenda via a process being called ‘quiet amnesty’ – a de-facto amnesty operation.
Quiet amnesty was defined in the report’s Executive Summary. It’s a Cloward-Piven-style strategy which utilizes the immigration court’s backlog (created via the massive illegal alien invasion) as a scapegoat to dismiss, close, or terminate cases against illegal aliens without sufficient judicial proceedings.
“The Biden-Harris Administration has used the immigration court backlog as an excuse to allow even more aliens to remain in the country. Instead of actually adjudicating illegal aliens’ cases based on the merits of aliens’ claims for relief—such as whether an alien has a valid and successful asylum claim—immigration judges under the Biden-Harris Administration have been tasked with rubberstamping case dismissals, case closures, and case terminations, all of which allow illegal aliens to remain in the United States without immigration consequences,” the report said on page 1.
It should be noted that the alien invasion agenda is part of a bigger worldwide program from the global government body, the United Nations, called Replacement Migration.
“For nearly four years, the Biden-Harris Administration has systematically remade America’s immigration courts in the image of open-borders extremism,” the report said on page 15.
The number of these cases were quantified in the Executive Summary as well.
“Since President Biden and Vice President Harris took office, the immigration court case backlog has skyrocketed, with more than 3.7 million new cases since the beginning of fiscal year 2021. In just the first three quarters of fiscal year 2024, there were more than 1.5 million new cases filed with the nation’s immigration courts. The majority of those cases are based on claims that ultimately will prove unsuccessful. Of the asylum cases that were adjudicated in fiscal year 2023, only 14 percent resulted in an asylum grant, with the remaining cases denied, abandoned, dismissed, terminated, withdrawn, or administratively closed,” the report said on page 1.
Nearly 1 million illegal aliens are unlawfully still in the U.S. due to quiet amnesty.
“This oversight has revealed how the Biden-Harris Administration has used administrative maneuvering in immigration court proceedings to allow nearly 1 million illegal aliens to remain in the U.S. indefinitely,” the report said on page 1.
Page 2 lists bullet points detailing the Biden-Harris de-facto illegal alien amnesty operation.
Page 4 of the report refer to the Biden-Harris illegal alien policy as ‘weaponized migration’. Page 14 detailed how the immigration court works to silence critics.
“At the same time as the Biden-Harris Administration weaponized immigration judges to advance an open-borders agenda, immigration court leadership worked to silence critics,” the report said on page 14. “According to press reports, in February 2024, EOIR’s Chief Immigration Judge Sheila McNulty ordered certain current immigration judges ‘to get supervisor approval to speak publicly to anyone outside the Justice Department,’ in an effort to silence critics of the ‘heavily backlogged immigration courts.’ As the Committee and Subcommittee noted in a March 2024 letter to EOIR, the ‘reported gag order on immigration judges appears to violate a provision in the annual federal appropriations law that guarantees the right of all federal employees to speak freely with Congress without interference from his or her employer.’ On April 3, 2024, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) confirmed that EOIR had sought to gag certain immigration judges, finding that EOIR ‘issued immigration judges a policy on speaking engagements that did not include the anti-gag order language and emailed two judges a message referencing the speaking engagements policy that was perceived as a gag order.’ According to OSC, EOIR ‘agreed to revise the policy to include the required language, send an email with the revised policy that clarified that the policy does not restrict employees’ rights to make protected disclosures or engage in protected activity, and have OSC conduct training’.”