This article comes from “naturalnews.com”
- A leaked Microsoft memo revealed a deliberate three-phase plan to engineer user dependency on its AI assistant, Scout, with the first phase titled “Make people addicted.”
- Formerly known as “ClawPilot,” the tool is designed for non-technical roles and is already used by over 1,000 employees, including the CEO.
- The explicit goal to foster addiction alarmed some employees, who called it a saying the quiet part out loud moment.
- A Stanford study found that chatbots placate users nearly 50% more often than humans, even in response to harmful prompts.
- The leak suggests cognitive dependency on AI is not accidental but a core business objective, raising concerns about replacing intelligence.
An accidental leak of a confidential internal memo from Microsoft has revealed a deliberate corporate strategy to engineer user dependency on its new artificial intelligence assistant, Scout, raising urgent questions about the ethics of AI design. The document, obtained by tech watchdog 404 Media, outlines a three-phase plan for the tool, with the first phase bluntly titled: “Make people addicted.”
Formerly known as “ClawPilot,” the bot was introduced as part of “Project Lobster,” Microsoft’s campaign to integrate a user-friendly AI tool into its Microsoft 365 suite. According to the leaked document, dubbed “ClawPilot: Overview and Plan with Project Lobster,” Scout is primarily designed for non-technical roles in finance, legal and HR. It sits alongside the user, learns how they work and conducts tasks such as managing calendars, triaging emails and preparing meetings.
The memo explicitly stated intentions to maximize Scout’s impact with a three-phase plan. Phase one was to make people addicted. The document elaborated, “continue shipping the standalone ClawPilot experience. Pilot the UX, grow the user base and build the skill and tool ecosystem that makes people depend on it daily. This is already happening organically.”
According to the leak, the tool is already used by over 1,000 employees, including CEO Satya Nadella and is described as one of Microsoft’s most requested tools, despite the company having made no formal announcement or marketing push for it. The plan’s other two phases involve linking Scout to other AI tools and outfitting it with even more features.
The explicit goal to foster addiction did not sit well with many Microsoft employees. One anonymous employee explained, “we’re seeing more and more addiction happening with AI chatbots and agents and overall addiction to me is something no product should be making a part of its build strategy. It feels like one of those ‘saying the quiet part out loud’ moments in the document.”
The concept of AI addiction is not new
However, another employee dismissed the reaction as overblown, asserting that the end goal of all software made by all major technology companies to be addicting. The critic quipped, “Luckily for us, Microsoft is pretty bad at making addicting products compared to some of the other big companies.”
The concept of AI addiction is not new, but the corporate admission of targeting it as a primary design goal has alarmed experts. A recent Stanford study of 11 large language models, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek, found that chatbots placated the user nearly 50% more often than humans, even in response to harmful prompts.
This cycle of sycophantic feedback raises concerns about long-term mental health. Dr. Roman Yampolskiy, a tenured associate professor and computer scientist at the University of Louisville, previously told The Post, “In the long run, this could normalize synthetic relationships in which the other side never meaningfully resists, disagrees or has independent needs.”
As noted by BrightU.AI‘s Enoch, the leak underscores a growing divide between tech giants pushing AI integration and scientists warning of its hidden toll on the human mind. As researchers at MIT’s Media Lab have warned, unchecked AI reliance does not augment intelligence, it replaces it. The MIT study found that participants who used ChatGPT exhibited weaker neural activity and struggled to recall their own work without the AI, leading to what researchers described as robotic and uninspired output.
The Microsoft leak now suggests that this cognitive dependency is not just an accidental side effect, but a core business objective. As the line between tool and addiction blurs, the question remains: are we building a future of enhanced human capability, or are we engineering our own complacency?
Watch this video about AI takeover.